Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 11:08

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Treasury yields tick higher after latest U.S. jobs data release - CNBC
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What are some good customer engagement platforms?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Air India plane crash: Investigation underway, black boxes found - ABC News
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What should I do if I love a girl and she apparently doesn't love me?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
ESA supports Moon mission carrying first European rover - European Space Agency
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Simone Biles spars with Riley Gaines on social media over trans athlete debate - New York Post
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.